Monism, Dualism and Pluralism

From ethics to metaphysics and everything in between

Monism, Dualism and Pluralism

Postby Bill » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:52 pm

Just think, we can now rehash the entire monism, dualism, pluralism debate from scratch.

Yay!
The only reality is the moment that we call "Now".
= = = =
We evolved to seek dinner, not to seek the truth - Mark Whatever
User avatar
Bill
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5027
Images: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: South Orange, CA
Blog: View Blog (8)
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: United States

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby JonathanElliot » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:23 pm

A whole section just for this question? I'd prefer to see just a general philosophy one myself. After all, where do I put questions that don't come under "Monism" etc?
User avatar
JonathanElliot
Member
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: New Zealand

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby Bill » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:59 pm

You is so picky ... :)
The only reality is the moment that we call "Now".
= = = =
We evolved to seek dinner, not to seek the truth - Mark Whatever
User avatar
Bill
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5027
Images: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: South Orange, CA
Blog: View Blog (8)
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: United States

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby JonathanElliot » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:30 pm

Yes, I am :) But I'm also trying to be helpful in getting the initial forum set up to be useful for everyone.

Wouldn't it be annoying if I started talking about Schopenhauer's philosophy of art under this heading? Considering it has nothing to do with the title :)
User avatar
JonathanElliot
Member
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: New Zealand

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby Bill » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:35 pm

For now, we shall just have a philosophy forum. Singular. A catch all.

Later, if member pressure becomes intense, we can parse out sub-divisions.

:)
The only reality is the moment that we call "Now".
= = = =
We evolved to seek dinner, not to seek the truth - Mark Whatever
User avatar
Bill
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5027
Images: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: South Orange, CA
Blog: View Blog (8)
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: United States

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby JonathanElliot » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:37 pm

Yay, perfect! That's exactly what I was hoping for. Thanks.
User avatar
JonathanElliot
Member
Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: New Zealand
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: New Zealand

Re: A Fresh Start ...

Postby UnReAL » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:35 am

"Philosophy" is a good way to encapsulate most of these ideas. We need to get this site active again. I grow tired of the insolence from atheists on other sites, especially the ones at the christian forum. They're the kind that continue to assert the "Atheism/Theism" duality, and they claim I must choose between the 2. They've tried to wedge the neutral agnostics out of a position. Not only that, but they're more like "ignostic atheists" as they use ignosticism as a means of justifying their atheism. Argh the futility!!
UnReAL
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (2)
Affiliation: Prefer not to say

Re: Monism, Dualism and Pluralism

Postby romansh » Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:40 pm

OK
for me:
Monism Derives from the observation that pretty much everything I can think of is connected by cause and effect to some degree indirectly, if not directly. This of course leads to some conclusions that are not intuitive and definitely are uncomfortable. Evolution definitely has not endowed us with a sense of monism.

This is embodied in the Buddhist's concept of Indra's net
Image
Dualism From an individual's evolutionary perspective this is a vital concept. Some examples: What's me, how can 'me' replicate and what is not me. Good and Evil (what's ultimately beneficial or not to my replication). Of course this evolutionary perspective gets carried away at times, eg ying and yang, and God and the rest of the universe. Nevertheless it is a relatively useful concept, though it can lead us astray if we believe it too much.

Pluralism I love pluralism, it is what our science is built on. With its spectrums and catergorizations we have to be careful we choose our boundaries carefully. For example when I think of a tree, how separate is it from sunlight, soil, the flora and fauna that coexist with it? Of course there are many kinds of tree and some these may even be big sturdy bushes. But as a scientist it is a useful tool.

Now for me pluralism points to monism being a more accurate description of our existence. Though I would agree with those that say monism is not useful other than promoting awareness.
"That's right!" shouted Vroomfondel, "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Douglas Adams
User avatar
romansh
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4671
Images: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: BC/US border - in the woods
Affiliation: Agnostic

Re: Monism, Dualism and Pluralism

Postby romansh » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:42 am

Bill wrote:
romansh wrote:Yep we are one - Monism rules.
;)

Au contraire - we are further proof that complexity evolves out of simplicity.
Pluralism strikes again!
Yay!

I can't be doing a good job of explaining monism or at least my version of it.
Just because things are arranged in a complex manner, it does not make them inherent, intrinsic or indpendent.
If we assign any of those i properties to an object, that's exactly what we have done. Assigned those properties.
"That's right!" shouted Vroomfondel, "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Douglas Adams
User avatar
romansh
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4671
Images: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: BC/US border - in the woods
Affiliation: Agnostic

Re: Monism, Dualism and Pluralism

Postby Bill » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:18 pm

And I am not making clear my view of complexity from simplicity.

In the furnace of the interior of the massive stars, the process of converting hydrogen to helium throws off the heavy elements which have different properties than either helium or hydrogen.

The building blocks have created new elements that are more complex. and have different characteristics, even though they "consist" of the same basic building blocks.

A Tyrannosaurus Rex is more complex than a trilobite. Pointing to the identical underlying elements of each does not take away that complexity, but simply attempts to dismiss the difference as being trivial.

But then, as far as I can so far tell, monism does seem to spend a lot of time trying to trivialize everything ...

:)
The only reality is the moment that we call "Now".
= = = =
We evolved to seek dinner, not to seek the truth - Mark Whatever
User avatar
Bill
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5027
Images: 1
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: South Orange, CA
Blog: View Blog (8)
Affiliation: Agnostic
Country: United States

Next

Return to Philosophy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron